|
|
Post by nepnymph on May 31, 2012 11:59:28 GMT 7
*SO = seed original  truncata SO BW  sanguinea SO LHNN  truncata x spectabilis SO Tristans  truncata xx trusmadiensis SO EP  truncata x thorelii EP basal cutting  lowii x truncata (wide peri) SO EP  (lowii x veitchii) x boschiana SO EP  truncata x ephippiata SO EP  ventricosa x ephippiata SO EP (intermediate)  lowii x boschiana SO EP clone 1   lowii x boschiana SO EP clone 2 Hope you enjoy Hopefully by fall seedlings will be larger and showing something new. |
|
|
|
Post by brett0 on May 31, 2012 12:18:39 GMT 7
The N. Truncata x xTrusmadiensis looks very promising.
Nice plants all round
The description SO clone 1 and 2 is a contradiction though as a seed grown original is just that . A unique individual not an exact copy.
Cheers
Brett
|
|
|
|
Post by mato77429 on May 31, 2012 12:45:22 GMT 7
A clone can be used to refer to a seed grown individual, as it simply refers to one plant with a specific genetic makeup. It does not have to be "cloned" to be a clone.
|
|
|
|
Post by Noa_F on May 31, 2012 21:01:01 GMT 7
They all look great! I that truncata x spectabilis is from Tristan's, then it is actually spectabilis x truncata (in case you like to keep accurate records). It's a cross I did a while back and gave to Tristan to distribute.
Noa
|
|
|
|
Post by nepnymph on Jun 1, 2012 1:06:27 GMT 7
brett0: Thank you and yes I do believe it will be fantastic with size. As for the use of "clone" I believe mato77429 sums it up, both of you are correct by technicalities.
mato77429: Thanks for chiming in. Glad that we as a whole equal "knowledge."
Noa_F: Thank you always nice hearing. As well for the name it was a mislabeling I'll be fixing that. As well glad to here it's from the same batch from you one got stolen, the other I believe I may I traded. But glad to have an authentic replacement.
|
|
|
|
Post by mass on Jun 1, 2012 2:06:39 GMT 7
If I didn't know any better I'd say we've got another stripe addict. Good to know I'm not alone..
|
|
|
|
Post by ellisonk001 on Jun 1, 2012 13:08:42 GMT 7
Wow Rob, everything looks great!!! They all seem to be hitting full stride. Lots of stripey goodness....
Thanks for sharing!
|
|
|
|
Post by nepnymph on Jun 3, 2012 17:13:00 GMT 7
mass: most definitely.
Keith: They're still being showy, though still a bit cranky.
|
|
|
|
Post by cpbobby on Jun 3, 2012 19:38:08 GMT 7
they look great and definitely popular with the spiders. lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by nepnymph on Jun 4, 2012 3:54:52 GMT 7
I think it's more mites that are leaving the 'webs' which in turn maybe the cause of the smaller sizes and slower growth.
|
|
